In a recent precedential judgment (CA 7934/20 Jafora v. Ben Shlush), the Israel Supreme Court held that in cases of split ownership of the same trademark in Israel and another country, trademark rights are not exhausted and parallel imports are not permitted. Jafora, Israel’s second largest manufacturer of soft drinks, is the registered owner of…
According to a recent controversial District Court judgment (Wyeth v. The Manufacturers’ Association of Israel), even when switching to a new generation product comprising the active ingredient, it is still necessary to maintain in force the original product registration on which the IL PTE was based (the first registration permitting the use of the active…
The ILPTO recently reconfirmed that missing the 90-day deadline for reporting the grant of a US PTE, which fulfils the ‘Two-State Requirement’, results in loss of PTE eligibility. The IL PTE system is based on the ‘Two-State Requirement’ linking eligibility of IL PTE to the grant of PTE/SPC in the US and in at least…
In a precedential decision, the ILPTO recently recognized for the first time the admissibility of strawman oppositions. Under Israeli law, any person can oppose a patent application prior to its grant. There are no limitations on the standing to oppose and the opponent does not need to establish any particular interest in the proceedings. Strawman…
In a recent decision, the ILTMO held that ‘cannabis trademarks’ and trademarks containing derivatives of the word cannabis must be limited to cannabis-related goods and that the use of cannabis trademarks in connection with non-cannabis products may render them deceptive and subject to revocation. Applicant filed a trademark application for the mark CANNASMETICS in classes…
The ILPTO clarified in a recent decision that divisional applications can be filed only until the allowance of the parent and that this deadline cannot be extended nor circumvented by seeking cancellation of the allowance of the parent application. Under IL law, divisional applications can be filed only until the allowance of the parent application.…
In a recent important decision, the ILTMO held that revocation of a trademark registration on grounds of non-use is discretionary and that registrations of well-known trademarks will not be revoked even if the use requirements were not satisfied. The ILTMO also significantly mitigated the adverse non-use consequences in case of failure to record trademark licenses.…